Blog - deepaksingh

Jack Moore Jack Moore

0 Course Enrolled • 0 Course Completed

Biography

試験の準備方法-最高のPSE-Strata-Pro-24受験料試験-真実的なPSE-Strata-Pro-24資格認定試験

われわれは今の競争の激しいIT社会ではくつかIT関連認定証明書が必要だとよくわかります。IT専門知識をテストしているPalo Alto NetworksのPSE-Strata-Pro-24認定試験は1つのとても重要な認証試験でございます。しかしこの試験は難しさがあって、合格率がずっと低いです。でもJpshikenの最新問題集がこの問題を解決できますよ。PSE-Strata-Pro-24認定試験の真実問題と模擬練習問題があって、十分に試験に合格させることができます。

Palo Alto Networks PSE-Strata-Pro-24 認定試験の出題範囲：

トピック
出題範囲

トピック 1

ビジネス価値と競争上の差別化要因: この試験セクションでは、テクニカルビジネス価値アナリストのスキルを測定し、Palo Alto Networks 次世代ファイアウォール (NGFW) の価値提案の特定に重点を置きます。受験者は、Panorama や SCM などのツールの技術的なビジネス上の利点を評価します。また、顧客に関連するトピックを認識し、それを Palo Alto Networks の最適なソリューションに合わせます。さらに、Strata 独自の差別化要因を理解することは、このドメインの重要な要素です。

トピック 2

導入と評価: この試験セクションでは、導入エンジニアのスキルを測定し、Palo Alto Networks NGFW の機能の特定に重点が置かれます。受験者は、既知と未知の両方の脅威から保護する機能を評価します。また、導入の観点から ID 管理を説明し、NGFW ソリューションの有効性の評価を含む価値証明 (PoV) プロセスについても説明します。

トピック 3

アーキテクチャと計画: この試験セクションでは、ネットワークアーキテクトのスキルを測定し、顧客の要件を理解し、適切な導入アーキテクチャを設計することに重点が置かれます。受験者は、Palo Alto Networks のプラットフォームネットワーキング機能を詳細に説明し、さまざまな環境への適合性を評価する必要があります。システムのサイズ設定や微調整などの側面の処理も、この分野で評価される重要なスキルです。

トピック 4

ネットワークセキュリティ戦略とベストプラクティス: この試験セクションでは、セキュリティ戦略スペシャリストのスキルを測定し、Palo Alto Networks の 5 段階のゼロトラスト手法の重要性を強調します。受験者は、堅牢なネットワークセキュリティを確保するためのベストプラクティスを重視しながら、ゼロトラストモデルに効果的にアプローチして適用する方法を理解する必要があります。

>> PSE-Strata-Pro-24受験料 <<

認定するPSE-Strata-Pro-24受験料 & 合格スムーズPSE-Strata-Pro-24資格認定試験 | 認定するPSE-Strata-Pro-24日本語試験情報

PSE-Strata-Pro-24の学習質問は、文化レベルの種類に関係なく、さまざまなレベルのユーザーに適しています。たとえ文化レベルが高くても、PSE-Strata-Pro-24トレーニング資料で自分に合ったものを見つけることができます。学習方法。それで、PSE-Strata-Pro-24学習教材のすべてのユーザーにとって、絶好の機会であり、さまざまなタイプから選択できます。また、ますます多くの学生がPSE-Strata-Pro-24テストガイドを選択します。 Palo Alto Networks Systems Engineer Professional - Hardware Firewallの学習質問を選択してください！

Palo Alto Networks Systems Engineer Professional - Hardware Firewall 認定 PSE-Strata-Pro-24 試験問題 (Q29-Q34):

質問 # 29
In addition to DNS Security, which three Cloud-Delivered Security Services (CDSS) subscriptions are minimum recommendations for all NGFWs that handle north-south traffic? (Choose three)

A. Advanced Threat Prevention
B. SaaS Security
C. Advanced WildFire
D. Enterprise DLP
E. Advanced URL Filtering

正解：A、C、E

解説：
North-south traffic refers to the flow of data in and out of a network, typically between internal resources and the internet. To secure this type of traffic, Palo Alto Networks recommends specific CDSS subscriptions in addition to DNS Security:
A: SaaS Security
SaaS Security is designed for monitoring and securing SaaS application usage but is not essential for handling typical north-south traffic.
B: Advanced WildFire
Advanced WildFire provides cloud-based malware analysis and sandboxing to detect and block zero-day threats. It is a critical component for securing north-south traffic against advanced malware.
C: Enterprise DLP
Enterprise DLP focuses on data loss prevention, primarily for protecting sensitive data. While important, it is not a minimum recommendation for securing north-south traffic.
D: Advanced Threat Prevention
Advanced Threat Prevention (ATP) replaces traditional IPS and provides inline detection and prevention of evasive threats in north-south traffic. It is a crucial recommendation for protecting against sophisticated threats.
E: Advanced URL Filtering
Advanced URL Filtering prevents access to malicious or harmful URLs. It complements DNS Security to provide comprehensive web protection for north-south traffic.
Key Takeaways:
* Advanced WildFire, Advanced Threat Prevention, and Advanced URL Filtering are minimum recommendations for NGFWs handling north-south traffic, alongside DNS Security.
* SaaS Security and Enterprise DLP, while valuable, are not minimum requirements for this use case.
References:
* Palo Alto Networks NGFW Best Practices
* Cloud-Delivered Security Services

質問 # 30
A systems engineer (SE) is working with a customer that is fully cloud-deployed for all applications. The customer is interested in Palo Alto Networks NGFWs but describes the following challenges:
"Our apps are in AWS and Azure, with whom we have contracts and minimum-revenue guarantees. We would use the built-in firewall on the cloud service providers (CSPs), but the need for centralized policy management to reduce human error is more important." Which recommendations should the SE make?

A. Cloud NGFWs at both CSPs; provide the customer a license for a Panorama virtual appliance from their CSP's marketplace of choice to centrally manage the systems.
B. Cloud NGFWs in AWS and VM-Series firewall in Azure; the customer selects a PAYG licensing Panorama deployment in their CSP of choice.
C. VM-Series firewalls in both CSPs; manually built Panorama in the CSP of choice on a host of either type: Palo Alto Networks provides a license.
D. VM-Series firewall and CN-Series firewall in both CSPs; provide the customer a private-offer Panorama virtual appliance from their CSP's marketplace of choice to centrally manage the systems.

正解：A

解説：
The customer is seeking centralized policy management to reduce human error while maintaining compliance with their contractual obligations to AWS and Azure. Here's the evaluation of each option:
* Option A: Cloud NGFWs at both CSPs; provide the customer a license for a Panorama virtual appliance from their CSP's marketplace of choice to centrally manage the systems
* Cloud NGFW is a fully managed Next-Generation Firewall service by Palo Alto Networks, offered in AWS and Azure marketplaces. It integrates natively with the CSP infrastructure, making it a good fit for customers with existing CSP agreements.
* Panorama, Palo Alto Networks' centralized management solution, can be deployed as a virtual appliance in the CSP marketplace of choice, enabling centralized policy management across all NGFWs.
* This option addresses the customer's need for centralized management while leveraging their existing contracts with AWS and Azure.
* This option is appropriate.
* Option B: Cloud NGFWs in AWS and VM-Series firewall in Azure; the customer selects a PAYG licensing Panorama deployment in their CSP of choice
* This option suggests using Cloud NGFW in AWS but VM-Series firewalls in Azure. While VM- Series is a flexible virtual firewall solution, it may not align with the customer's stated preference for CSP-managed services like Cloud NGFW.
* This option introduces a mix of solutions that could complicate centralized management and reduce operational efficiency.
* This option is less appropriate.
* Option C: VM-Series firewalls in both CSPs; manually built Panorama in the CSP of choice on a host of either type: Palo Alto Networks provides a license
* VM-Series firewalls are well-suited for cloud deployments but require more manual configuration compared to Cloud NGFW.
* Building a Panorama instance manually on a host increases operational overhead and does not leverage the customer's existing CSP marketplaces.
* This option is less aligned with the customer's needs.
* Option D: VM-Series firewall and CN-Series firewall in both CSPs; provide the customer a private-offer Panorama virtual appliance from their CSP's marketplace of choice to centrally manage the systems
* This option introduces both VM-Series and CN-Series firewalls in both CSPs. While CN-Series firewalls are designed for Kubernetes environments, they may not be relevant if the customer does not specifically require container-level security.
* Adding CN-Series firewalls may introduce unnecessary complexity and costs.
* This option is not appropriate.
References:
* Palo Alto Networks documentation on Cloud NGFW
* Panorama overview in Palo Alto Knowledge Base
* VM-Series firewalls deployment guide in CSPs: Palo Alto Documentation

質問 # 31
Which technique is an example of a DNS attack that Advanced DNS Security can detect and prevent?

A. High entropy DNS domains
B. DNS domain rebranding
C. CNAME cloaking
D. Polymorphic DNS

正解：A

解説：
Advanced DNS Security on Palo Alto Networks firewalls is designed to identify and prevent a wide range of DNS-based attacks. Among the listed options, "High entropy DNS domains" is a specific example of a DNS attack that Advanced DNS Security can detect and block.
* Why "High entropy DNS domains" (Correct Answer A)?High entropy DNS domains are often used in attacks where randomly generated domain names (e.g., gfh34ksdu.com) are utilized by malware or bots to evade detection. This is a hallmark of Domain Generation Algorithms (DGA)-based attacks.
Palo Alto Networks firewalls with Advanced DNS Security use machine learning to detect such domains by analyzing the entropy (randomness) of DNS queries. High entropy values indicate the likelihood of a dynamically generated or malicious domain.
* Why not "Polymorphic DNS" (Option B)?While polymorphic DNS refers to techniques that dynamically change DNS records to avoid detection, it is not specifically identified as an attack type mitigated by Advanced DNS Security in Palo Alto Networks documentation. The firewall focuses more on the behavior of DNS queries, such as detecting DGA domains or anomalous DNS traffic patterns.
* Why not "CNAME cloaking" (Option C)?CNAME cloaking involves using CNAME records to redirect DNS queries to malicious or hidden domains. Although Palo Alto firewalls may detect and block malicious DNS redirections, the focus of Advanced DNS Security is primarily on identifying patterns of DNS abuse like DGA domains, tunneling, or high entropy queries.
* Why not "DNS domain rebranding" (Option D)?DNS domain rebranding involves changing the domain names associated with malicious activity to evade detection. This is typically a tactic used for persistence but is not an example of a DNS attack type specifically addressed by Advanced DNS Security.
Advanced DNS Security focuses on dynamic, real-time identification of suspicious DNS patterns, such as high entropy domains, DNS tunneling, or protocol violations. High entropy DNS domains are directly tied to attack mechanisms like DGAs, making this the correct answer.

質問 # 32
A prospective customer has provided specific requirements for an upcoming firewall purchase, including the need to process a minimum of 200,000 connections per second while maintaining at least 15 Gbps of throughput with App-ID and Threat Prevention enabled.
What should a systems engineer do to determine the most suitable firewall for the customer?

A. Upload 30 days of customer firewall traffic logs to the firewall calculator tool on the Palo Alto Networks support portal.
B. Download the firewall sizing tool from the Palo Alto Networks support portal.
C. Use the product selector tool available on the Palo Alto Networks website.
D. Use the online product configurator tool provided on the Palo Alto Networks website.

正解：B

解説：
* Firewall Sizing Tool (Answer B):
* Thefirewall sizing toolis the most accurate way to determine the suitable firewall model based on specific customer requirements, such as throughput, connections per second, and enabled features like App-ID and Threat Prevention.
* By inputting traffic patterns, feature requirements, and performance needs, the sizing tool provides tailored recommendations.
* Why Not A:
* While uploading traffic logs to the calculator tool may help analyze traffic trends, it is not the primary method for determining firewall sizing.
* Why Not C or D:
* Theproduct configurator toolandproduct selector toolare not designed for detailed performance analysis based on real-world requirements like connections per second or enabled features.
References from Palo Alto Networks Documentation:
* Firewall Sizing Guide

質問 # 33
A prospective customer wants to validate an NGFW solution and seeks the advice of a systemsengineer (SE) regarding a design to meet the following stated requirements:
"We need an NGFW that can handle 72 Gbps inside of our core network. Our core switches only have up to
40 Gbps links available to which new devices can connect. We cannot change the IP address structure of the environment, and we need protection for threat prevention, DNS, and perhaps sandboxing." Which hardware and architecture/design recommendations should the SE make?

A. PA-5445 or larger to cover the bandwidth need and the link types; Architect aggregate interface groups in Layer-2 or virtual wire mode that include 2 x 40Gbps interfaces on both sides of the path.
B. PA-5445 or larger to cover the bandwidth need and the link types; Architect aggregate interface groups in Layer-3 mode that include 40Gbps interfaces on both sides of the path.
C. PA-5430 or larger to cover the bandwidth need and the link types; Architect aggregate interface groups in Layer-2 or virtual wire mode that include 2 x 40Gbps interfaces on both sides of the path.
D. PA-5430 or larger to cover the bandwidth need and the link types; Architect aggregate interface groups in Layer-3 mode that include 40Gbps interfaces on both sides of the path.

正解：A

解説：
The problem provides several constraints and design requirements that must be carefully considered:
* Bandwidth Requirement:
* The customer needs an NGFW capable of handling a total throughput of 72 Gbps.
* The PA-5445 is specifically designed for high-throughput environments and supports up to81.3 Gbps Threat Prevention throughput(as per the latest hardware performance specifications).
This ensures the throughput needs are fully met with some room for growth.
* Interface Compatibility:
* The customer mentions that their core switches support up to40 Gbps interfaces. The design must include aggregate links to meet the overall bandwidth while aligning with the 40 Gbps interface limitations.
* The PA-5445 supports40Gbps QSFP+ interfaces, making it a suitable option for the hardware requirement.
* No Change to IP Address Structure:
* Since the customer cannot modify their IP address structure, deploying the NGFW inLayer-2 or Virtual Wire modeis ideal.
* Virtual Wire modeallows the firewall to inspect traffic transparently between two Layer-2 devices without modifying the existing IP structure. Similarly, Layer-2 mode allows the firewall to behave like a switch at Layer-2 while still applying security policies.
* Threat Prevention, DNS, and Sandboxing Requirements:
* The customer requires advanced security features likeThreat Preventionand potentially sandboxing(WildFire). The PA-5445 is equipped to handle these functionalities with its dedicated hardware-based architecture for content inspection and processing.
* Aggregate Interface Groups:
* The architecture should includeaggregate interface groupsto distribute traffic across multiple physical interfaces to support the high throughput requirement.
* By aggregating2 x 40Gbps interfaces on both sides of the pathin Virtual Wire or Layer-2 mode, the design ensures sufficient bandwidth (up to 80 Gbps per side).
Why PA-5445 in Layer-2 or Virtual Wire mode is the Best Option:
* Option Asatisfies all the customer's requirements:
* The PA-5445 meets the 72 Gbps throughput requirement.
* 2 x 40 Gbps interfaces can be aggregated to handle traffic flow between the core switches and the NGFW.
* Virtual Wire or Layer-2 mode preserves the IP address structure, while still allowing full threat prevention and DNS inspection capabilities.
* The PA-5445 also supports sandboxing (WildFire) for advanced file-based threat detection.
Why Not Other Options:
Option B:
* The PA-5430 is insufficient for the throughput requirement (72 Gbps). Itsmaximum Threat Prevention throughput is 60.3 Gbps, which does not provide the necessary capacity.
Option C:
* While the PA-5445 is appropriate, deploying it inLayer-3 modewould require changes to the IP address structure, which the customer explicitly stated is not an option.
Option D:
* The PA-5430 does not meet the throughput requirement. Although Layer-2 or Virtual Wire mode preserves the IP structure, the throughput capacity of the PA-5430 is a limiting factor.
References from Palo Alto Networks Documentation:
* Palo Alto Networks PA-5400 Series Datasheet (latest version)
* Specifies the performance capabilities of the PA-5445 and PA-5430 models.
* Palo Alto Networks Virtual Wire Deployment Guide
* Explains how Virtual Wire mode can be used to transparently inspect traffic without changing the existing IP structure.
* Aggregated Ethernet Interface Documentation
* Details the configuration and use of aggregate interface groups for high throughput.

質問 # 34
......

過去10年間で、当社JpshikenはPSE-Strata-Pro-24学習教材の品質の改善を止めませんでした。長い間、PSE-Strata-Pro-24試験問題を完成させるために多くのお金を投資してきました。同時に、PSE-Strata-Pro-24テストトレントを完成させるために、最先端の技術と研究者を導入しました。現在、当社の全体的な強さは以前よりもはるかに強くなっています。私たちは市場のリーダーであり、最先端の技術を習得しています。高品質のPSE-Strata-Pro-24トレーニングガイドを使用すると、PSE-Strata-Pro-24試験に確実に合格します。

PSE-Strata-Pro-24資格認定試験: https://www.jpshiken.com/PSE-Strata-Pro-24_shiken.html